Personally, due to the very nature of the genre, savescumming feels like it inherently cheapens the experience to me. That said, people can play however they want, it's not affecting my experience. Now let's carefully back away from the topic of killing Izchak before the thread bursts into flames.
It's a shopkeeper in Nethack, named in memory of one of the Nethack devs who isn't exactly alive right now.
Some consider it very poor etiquette to kill him - and some don't. Some people feel very strongly about it.
Anyways, back on topic - anyone know if Kronging an arti (say, Poncho With No Name) so that it acquires a special name and such makes it more susceptible to corruption? I'm slightly confused as to whether "unnamed" artis can be corrupted at all, or not.
I failed to Krong one sparkling glove once. I put it on anvil and immediately receive "sits here testament of your poor crafting ability" message.
These things are so much more fun to speculate on than to google. Don't Make Me Ice Jump At (your) Innards! I Don't Even Know Why You Are Trying To Read Wit Dat Ass! Caps Was Please Saying To Lie Turgidly? (I've got no bloody idea on this one) I do like TTBOMK though. I can just read it "phonetically"ish in my head.
Hush, essence. You're wrecking our fun. I know it was supposed to be "To The Best Of My Knowledge" (though it should be TtBoMK, but who am I to correct something like that when it's already become well-known).